According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, in March 1995, the General Accounting Office (GAO) addressed internal controls in a report on Clean Air Rulemaking which concluded that EPA did not have a systematic way of measuring the impact of its efforts to reduce the time it takes to issue rules. The GAO recommended that the EPA implement a tracking system to record key dates, resources, and historical information needed to monitor and evaluate the Agency’s clean air rule-making process. The GAO wanted to reduce the toxins in the air and claimed that the EPA should have already tackled this issue.
What Strategy Did The EPA Come Up With To Tackle Air Pollution?
The Environmental Protection Agency organized a scope and methodology of standards that can help maintain company’s emissions standards to reduce toxic air. The Maximum Achievable Control Technologies (MACT) principles were created and are basically performance standards created to drastically reduce air toxin emissions. These are requirements that must be aggregated in a Title V operating permit. MACT compliance prevent companies from over-polluting the air.
Examples of Who Needs MACT Standards:
- Hospitals or Medical Labs
- Glass Manufacturers
- Nonferrous metals area sources: zinc, cadmium, & beryllium
- Solid Waste Companies (Commercial and Industrial)
- Cement Manufacturers
How Does MACT Auditing Effect Companies?
MACT Compliance prevents industrial users, who already emit hazardous air toxins, from over polluting. Industries who use higher pollution control technology are rewarded by the government for being up to date with their air control logistics. MACT auditing does not critically effect businesses unless there is to be a malfunction on their end.
Something like MACT Audit atlanta ga might revealed that ethylene oxide levels breached out of the acceptable zone of pollution. Ethylene oxide has been linked to many cases of cancer, since 2016. Without MACT auditing, the potential for the public to generate cancer skyrockets
The Foundation of MACT Auditing
The EPA organized this new auditing system by focusing on two objectives during the review. First, they needed to identify resources that helped push the MACT principles creation process. Then, the GAO had to look over the methods agencies used to determine the MACT platform for the emissions standards. The GAO had to review records that were available for the MACT development process. They interviewed agency personnel, state officials, and other interested parties who wanted to partake in this review. This activity began in October of 1994 and ended in August of 1995.
There are two different types of stationary sources that create emissions testing. According to Wikipedia, major sources “emit 10 or more tons per year of any of the listed toxic air pollutants, or 25 or more tons per year of a mixture of air toxics.” Area sources “do not emit more than 10 tons per year of a single air toxic or more than 25 tons per year of a combination of air toxics.”